Why the strongest communities aren’t built around leadership, but around shared ownership.
What would happen to your community if you disappeared tomorrow?
Not in a dramatic or worst-case scenario kind of way, but simply if you chose to step back for a period of time. Maybe you got busy, needed a break, or just stopped showing up as consistently. Would your community continue to function, or would things begin to slow down and eventually fade?
This is the question at the center of this episode of Find Your Freaks, and it is one that reveals more about the structure of a community than any engagement metric ever could. From the outside, many communities appear active and successful. There are posts, comments, and regular participation. But underneath that activity, there is often a hidden dependency on one person to sustain the energy, direction, and consistency of the space.
In this episode, I explore why sustainability in community building is not about increasing engagement, but about designing for shared ownership. I unpack the structural patterns that cause communities to become fragile over time, why burnout is often a predictable outcome rather than a personal failure, and what becomes possible when leadership shifts from being the center of the community to being part of a system that supports it.
Episode Highlights
- [02:00] The question that reveals whether your community is built to last
- [06:30] Why communities don’t actually fail from apathy
- [12:15] How distributed ownership changes participation
- [18:40] What happens when everything depends on one leader
- [25:10] The difference between self-sustaining and self-running communities
- [31:45] Why personality-driven communities are fragile
- [38:20] How purpose creates continuity beyond the founder
- [45:00] Delegation vs. true ownership and why it matters
- [51:30] One simple shift to start redistributing responsibility
- [57:00] The question every community leader needs to answer
It’s Not Apathy, It’s Burden
One of the most common explanations for struggling communities is that people simply do not care enough to engage. Leaders often interpret low participation or inconsistent activity as a lack of interest or investment from members. However, this explanation overlooks what is actually happening beneath the surface.
In many cases, people do care. The challenge is not a lack of desire to participate, but an imbalance in how responsibility is distributed within the community. When too much of the work, decision-making, and emotional labor rests on one person, the system becomes unsustainable. Over time, even the most committed leader will experience burnout, and when that happens, everything that depended on their presence begins to unravel.
This is why communities often appear strong right up until the moment they are not. The structure has been carrying hidden strain all along, and once the central support is removed, there is nothing in place to hold it together.
“Communities don’t fail because people don’t care. They fail because too much care is required from too few people.” — Tonya Kubo Share on X
Leader-centered communities often emerge naturally, especially in the early stages of building something new. The leader initiates conversations, answers questions, organizes events, and models the behavior they want to see. This level of involvement is not only helpful, but often necessary to establish the culture and direction of the community.
However, when this pattern continues without intentional design changes, it begins to create dependency. Members start to look to the leader as the primary source of value, rather than recognizing the contributions of others within the group. Conversations become centralized, with most interactions flowing through one person instead of developing organically between members.
Over time, this structure limits the growth and resilience of the community. It may still appear active, but its ability to function is tied directly to the leader’s availability and capacity. This creates a fragile system where any disruption in leadership can have an outsized impact on the entire community.
“A leader-centered community can look active and still be incredibly fragile.” — Tonya Kubo Share on X
Self-Sustaining Is Not the Same as Self-Running
It is important to clarify what is meant by a self-sustaining community, because it is often misunderstood. A self-sustaining community is not one where there is no leadership or where everything operates without structure. It is not a free-for-all where responsibility is unclear or absent.
Instead, a self-sustaining community is one where the structure supports participation from many people, rather than relying on one individual to carry the load. There are clear expectations, shared ownership, and multiple people who are capable of stepping into roles when needed. Leadership still exists, but it is distributed and supported by systems that allow others to contribute meaningfully.
This distinction matters because it shifts the goal from removing leadership to strengthening the foundation that allows leadership to be shared.
“A self-sustaining community doesn’t remove leadership. It removes dependency.” — Tonya Kubo Share on X
What This Looks Like in Practice
In the previous episode, Tonya shared an example of a military spouse community that approached this differently. Instead of following a traditional top-down structure, the leadership focused on creating the conditions for connection rather than controlling every aspect of the experience.
Members were encouraged to create and lead their own activities based on their interests, while the organization provided visibility and light structure. This meant that the responsibility for participation did not sit with one person, but was distributed across the community.
As a result, engagement became more meaningful and sustainable. People showed up not because they were being directed to, but because they had ownership over what was being created. The relationships that formed were not dependent on a single leader, which allowed the community to continue growing over time.
“Belonging grows when people have ownership, not just access.” — Tonya Kubo Share on X
Personality Versus Purpose
A critical factor in the sustainability of any community is whether it is built around a person or a purpose. Communities centered on a personality often experience rapid growth because people are drawn to the leader’s voice, perspective, or expertise. However, this type of structure creates a dependency that limits long-term resilience.
When a community is built around a purpose, the focus shifts from the individual to the shared mission or experience that brings people together. Members are able to contribute in ways that extend beyond the leader, and the value of the community is not tied to one person’s presence.
This shift allows the community to continue even as leadership evolves or changes. It creates a sense of continuity that is grounded in what the community stands for, rather than who is leading it.
“Communities built around personality are fragile. Communities built around purpose endure.” — Tonya Kubo Share on X
Delegation Is Not the Same as Ownership
In response to the challenges of leader-centered communities, many leaders attempt to solve the problem by delegating tasks. While delegation can reduce workload, it does not fundamentally change the structure of the community.
Delegation keeps authority and decision-making centralized, even as tasks are distributed. Members may help execute certain responsibilities, but they are still operating within a system that requires approval and direction from the leader.
Ownership, on the other hand, involves a deeper level of trust and autonomy. When members take ownership of a role or initiative, they are responsible for shaping it, maintaining it, and evolving it over time. They do not need constant oversight or permission to act.
This shift from delegation to ownership is what allows a community to become truly self-sustaining.
“Delegation shares tasks. Ownership shares responsibility.” — Tonya Kubo Share on X
A Practical Place to Start
For those already leading a community, transitioning to a more sustainable model does not require starting over. Instead, it begins with small, intentional changes.
One effective approach is to identify a single responsibility that currently depends on the leader and invite a member to take full ownership of it. This is not about assigning a task, but about transferring responsibility in a way that allows the member to shape and lead that aspect of the community.
Over time, these small shifts can change the culture of the community, creating an environment where shared ownership becomes the norm rather than the exception.
“If you want a stronger community, stop doing everything yourself.” — Tonya Kubo Share on X
The Question That Changes Everything
At its core, this conversation comes back to a single question: what would happen if you stepped away?
The answer to that question reveals whether a community has been designed for sustainability or dependency. If the community cannot function without the constant presence of its leader, it may be time to reconsider how responsibility, ownership, and participation are structured.
Designing for sustainability does not mean removing yourself from the community. It means building something that is strong enough to include you without requiring you.
“If your community can’t function without you, it isn’t sustainable yet.” — Tonya Kubo Share on X
Three Questions I’m Sitting With
- Where is my community dependent on me in ways that limit its growth?
- What would need to change for members to rely on each other instead of me?
- Am I building something that requires me, or something that includes me?
Meet Your Host
Tonya Kubo is a community strategist, writer, and rebel with a cause: helping people find the place where they truly belong. She’s spent nearly two decades building online spaces that feel more like chosen family than comment sections, and she’s not afraid to call out the fluff in favor of real connection. As the founder of Find Your Freaks, Tonya brings together unconventional thinkers, builders, and bridge-makers who believe that “normal” was never the point. When she’s not hosting the show, she’s raising two daughters, leading client communities, and making meaning out of the mess.
Episode Transcript
Get the full transcript from Episode 21.
Resources & Mentions
- Episode 020 – Interview with Stacey Morgan
- Margaret Marcuson, Sustainable Ministry
- The Secret to Thriving Online Communities (Facebook Group)
- Clutter-Free Academy by Kathi Lipp
Support the Show
If Find Your Freaks matters to you, help us keep it ad-free by buying us a coffee (or two!). Every dollar goes to production so more weirdos can find their people.
You can purchase Find Your Freaks merchandise online through Abilities and Attitudes.
Let’s Stay Freaky
What’s Next
Tonya sits down with Eli Trier, an artist, writer, podcaster, and self-described dopamine dealer whose work is a love letter to weirdos and misfits. As a neuroqueer, AuDHD creator, Eli shares what it means to build spaces where being different is not just accepted, but celebrated—and why belonging starts with making room for the outsider.
0 Comments